Select Page

Trump Entertainment Bankruptcy Kicks Betfair to the Curb

Betfair will have limited participation into the Trump Plaza shutdown, and is going to be scrambling for the new house now.

Even as Trump Entertainment Resorts (TER) filed for bankruptcy protection this week, online gaming operator Betfair’s involvement within the shutdown proceedings of the Trump Plaza became more twisted. That’s because the Internet gambling provider could also be homeless soon.

Trump Plaza’s parent, Trump Entertainment Resorts, simply filed for bankruptcy protection on Tuesday of this week. Betfair had initially planned and gotten the NJDGE’s blessing to switch their server housing over to sister property the Trump Taj Mahal, nevertheless now that property seems to be closing in mid-November as well, unless casino worker union wage battles are miraculously resolved during the eleventh hour.

As Atlantic City casinos continue steadily to shut, you can find a true wide range of ongoing storylines. Many locals are understandably focused on the immediate loss of thousands of jobs, while officials wonder in regards to the longer-term change for the city that will ideally ensure it is less casino-dependent. But another issue concerns the gambling that is online associated with these gambling enterprises, and what pc software providers and other partners can do within the wake of the closures.

According towards the NJDGE, these firms do at the least deserve a seat at the dining table. The DGE has consented to enable Betfair restricted participation of the closure proceedings of the Trump Plaza, as Betfair provides the platform on which the Trump Plaza’s online offerings were based.

Participation Limited, But Written Submissions Allowed

The ruling employs solicitors for Betfair Interactive US petitioned the DGE to possess some participation in the procedure month that is last. Deputy attorney general Sara Ben-David recommended the DGE that while she would be against Betfair’s wish to intervene, that they should at least be able to make written submissions to influence the process.

Company lawyers had hoped even for more, because they argued that the finish of gaming operations at Trump Plaza had an immediate and direct impact on ‘Betfair Interactive’s capacity to offer Web video gaming services in New Jersey.’

Ben-David accepted this argument. However, she additionally stated that there was nothing special about Trump Plaza to their relationship that managed to make it different from the various other organizations that have partnerships or would otherwise be impacted by the closure. Ben-David also found that Betfair may want to get the casino to release funds the ongoing business believes its due, but that the DGE isn’t the forum for that agreement dispute.

Trump Plaza Stated become Uncooperative

The ruling comes after Betfair claimed that Trump Plaza’s administration wasn’t cooperating using their efforts to manage the shutdown process.

‘Betfair Interactive has made duplicated written needs for information from Trump Plaza’s senior management on Trump Plaza’s plans for the casino, including once the closure had been formally established requesting in writing a face-to-face conference with senior administration in order to talk about the implications associated with impending closure of the Trump Plaza on the web gaming operation,’ Betfair’s attorneys wrote in a page to the DGE. ‘To date, Trump Plaza has neglected to even respond to Betfair Interactive’s requests.’

So far, Betfair’s online gambling operations in partnership aided by the Trump Plaza have actually been a bag that is mixed. Through July, the company had brought in around $4.3 million in revenue through their portals that are online New Jersey, which helped raise the firm’s overall US revenues. However, that was far below the market leaders in the continuing state, and the business’s poker space happens to be a deep failing, bringing in a comical $49 therefore far in 2014.

New York Casino Developers Pitch Plans in Albany

Tioga Downs is one for the contenders for the New York casino that is upstate license. (Image: Owego Pennysaver)

The upstate New York casino battle is beginning to come into sharper focus. The number of serious contenders has narrowed a bit from if the applications process started, and it is starting to become clear where the biggest battles will be fought. And now, state regulators have started to get a look at exactly just what each designer is proposing to bring to the Empire State along with their jobs.

On developers met in Albany to present their plans to a state panel that plans to award as many as four casino licenses to operators later this year monday. That saw the first seven contenders for these licenses try to wow the panel in order to get a leg up in the licensing race day.

Casino Operators Give 45-Minute Presentations

The proceedings were held for the Gaming Facility Location Board, a five-person panel that will eventually produce a last suggestion to the latest York State Gaming Commission. Each applicant was handed a 45-minute screen to make their case, with many using promotional videos alongside economic and revenue statistics.

Whilst the battle in the Catskills, where a casino (or two) will probably end up being authorized in Sullivan or Orange County, promises to be the most contentious, the Monday session dedicated to two less-prized locations. One is especially dedicated to the Southern Tier, which borders northern Pennsylvania, while the other is the capital area near Albany. Some well-known names in the gambling industry are battling with smaller, lesser-known companies who can’t afford to compete in the more sought-after locations in these areas.

That meant that there have been different paths taken by the various companies vying for what will more than likely be just one single license in each of these regions. A racetrack located west of Binghamton, tried to use its small-scale proposed upgrade to their current facilities as a selling point, saying the gambling potential in the area is very limited for instance, Tioga Downs.

On the other hand, some companies wanted the panel to dream big. Traditions by the Glen, a resort near Binghamton, asked regulators to ‘Think Big, Really Big.’ a proposal in Tyre, a spot west of Syracuse, said they expected to make $263 million a year in gambling revenues, which had been met with doubt by some on the panel.

Tough Rock Among Prospective Developers

Tricky Rock International was the biggest business in the mix on Monday, and they wanted the panel to consider their brand recognition whenever making the decision.

‘The Hard Rock brand is the preferred model of choice,’ stated James F. Allen, president of complex Rock International. ‘That means something.’

One of the major objectives of the casino that is new program is to bring economic development to regions of hawaii that truly need it. That became a point that is heavy of in lots of the presentations. For instance, analyst Nicole Dunn talked about the indegent financial status in the Binghamton area while advocating for the Tioga Downs proposal.

‘ The historical styles are bad,’ Dunn said. ‘The projected styles are also bad.’

In total, there are 16 developers still in contention for the four licenses which can be expected to be awarded in upstate New York. On Tuesday, designers seeking to build in the Hudson Valley and also the Catskills, which is considered the most region that is prized had been scheduled to provide their cases. Organizations in search of the one or two licenses in that region include Caesars Entertainment as well as the Genting Group.

Massachusetts Casino Proposals Flawed, Says Panel

A rendering of the proposed Wynn Resort in Everett, Massachusetts; the commission felt the look was generic and lackluster. (Image: Wynn Resorts Holdings)

Massachusetts casino contenders Wynn Resorts and Mohegan Sun might need to rethink their casino plans if they wish stand the possibility of getting their arms on the one state gaming permit available. That is the surprising initial verdict of the panel of regulators charged with choosing a winner regarding the Massachusetts casino that is seemingly unending war.

The panel, which will invest the week scrutinizing both plans, announced at the finish of this very first day of deliberations that these people were not completely pleased with either. For Wynn Resorts, it is a question of uninspiring architectural design, said regulators, while for Mohegan Sun it is about an uninspiring level of investment. Both companies may need certainly to change their ideas so as to get the go-ahead.

The deliberations represent the final chapter of a saga that is long-running has, at times, resembled a dirty tricks governmental campaign, as organizations vied for the eye of regulators in a hugely competitive bidding process, which occasionally descended into tit-for-tat recriminations. One bidder, Caesars Entertainment, even pulled out from the process following a $100 million marketing campaign, and later filed a lawsuit up against the former head associated with Gaming Commission for over a so-called conflict of great interest.

Generic Design

Outlining criticisms, Commissioner James McHugh, said that the Wynn project does not have the imagination of other Wynn properties in Las Vegas and Macau, and that the condition of the permit would be that Wynn considers redesigning the exterior. The Wynn Everett consists of a rather simple hotel tower, lacking architectural innovation and flourish in its current form.

‘It’s a generic design and does perhaps not reflect something unique to Massachusetts,’ McHugh complained. ‘It does not capture the energy that this ongoing company is effective at.’

McHugh also criticized Wynn Resort’s failure to handle traffic problems in Sullivan Square, through which 60 percent of the proposed casino’s traffic would be likely to visit. While there clearly was no recommendation made on the steps Wynn Resorts might take to remedy the situation, it is an issue that is probable to be addressed later on in the week.

McHugh had been complete of praise for Mohegan Sun’s curved-glass offering, however, calling it ‘a creative design that acknowledges its place within its surroundings. The style approach fits well with the site and neighborhoods that are adjacent is attractively styled, and shows its compatibility with environments,’ he said. The Mohegan Sun traffic plan, meanwhile, was ‘complete and practical.’

Low Construction Costs

However, there were concerns about Mohegan Sun’s monetary plan and its level of investment in the task. Developers are required to invest at least $500 million in a resort development of the type or kind in an effort become considered for a license, a figure that excludes the expense of financing and land. Mohegan Sun just scrapes past the requirement that is basic a spend of $526 million. Meanwhile, Wynn’s investment in this area is more than $1 billion, stated Commissioner Enrique Zuniga.

Furthermore, Wynn’s construction costs are $957 million, which dwarfs that of Mohegan Sun, at $376 million. That creates a much larger average investment per hotel room, which means ‘a rough estimate of quality,’ the Commission said.

The commission also highlighted concerns that Mohegan Sun can be tempted to operate a vehicle customers to its Foxwoods facility in Connecticut, where it pays less taxes. The Commission is searching for assurances that this will never be the situation.