Select Page

Romantic Partners, Friends, Friends with Advantages, and Casual Acquaintances As Sexual Partners

Wyndol Furman

Department of Psychology, 2155 S. Race Street, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208

Laura Shaffer

Department of Psychology, University of Louisville class of Medicine, 401 E. Chestnut Street, Suite 600, Louisville, KY 40202


The goal of the current study had been to offer reveal study of intimate behavior with several types of lovers. A sample of 163 young grownups reported on the light nongenital, heavy nongenital, and vaginal sexual intercourse with intimate lovers, buddies, and casual acquaintances. They described their intercourse with “friends with benefits” as well as with buddies as a whole. Teenagers had been almost certainly to take part in sexual behavior with intimate lovers, but behavior that is sexual usually took place with a few kind of nonromantic partner. More adults engaged in some kind of sexual behavior with casual acquaintances than with buddies with advantages. The frequencies of intimate behavior, nevertheless, had been greater with friends with advantages than with buddies or casual acquaintances. Interview and questionnaire information revealed that buddies with advantages had been typically buddies, however fundamentally. Nonsexual tasks were additionally less common with buddies with advantages than many other buddies. Taken together, the findings illustrate the worth of differentiating among various kinds of nonromantic lovers and differing levels of intimate behavior.

Many research on intimate behavior have not considered the type of this relationship by which it happens. As soon as the context associated with the relationship is considered, the investigation has dedicated to intimate behavior in intimate relationships or some subset of intimate relationships, such as for example marriages or cohabitating couples (e.g. Kaestle & Halpern, 2007; O’Sullivan, Mantsun, Harris, & Brooks-Gunn, 2007). Yet the sexual behavior of young grownups and adolescents frequently does occur various other contexts. Such sexual intercourse has been commonly described as casual intercourse, nonromantic intimate behavior, or “hook-ups. ” The important points of this definitions differ, however they have actually the normal denominator of talking about intimate behavior in uncommitted relationships (Weaver & Herold, 2000).

Intercourse often does occur first in an enchanting or relationship that is committed but around 25% of that time, it first occurs with a buddy, complete stranger, or somebody anyone is dating periodically (Elo, King, & Furstenberg, 1999; Manning, Longmore, & Giordano, 2000). Furthermore, about half of sexually active adolescents have experienced sexual intercourse with a nonromantic partner (Grello, Welsh, & Harper, 2006; Manning, Giordano, & Longmore, 2006; Manning, Longmore, & Giordano, 2005). About 50 % of the incidents having a nonromantic partner took place just once (Manning, et al. 2006). Likewise, around 75–80% of university students reported “hooking up” or engaging in certain kind of sexual intercourse with somebody just for a night (England, Shafer, & Fogarty, 2007; Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000); 30% reported setting up with some body for the evening and intercourse that is havingPaul, et al., 2000).

Many detectives never have differentiated among different lovers in the category that is general of or nonromantic intimate partners. Some detectives have actually analyzed one particular group of nonromantic partners ( e.g. camfuze mobile Buddies or friends with advantages ), however it is unclear if their findings are certain compared to that category or can be applied to many other forms of casual or nonromantic intimate lovers.

Into the two studies that did consist of multiple groups (Grello, et al. 2006; Manning, et al. 2005), friends had been probably the most typical form of partner. Up to now, reasonably small is famous about variations in the activity that is sexual various partners. Grello, et al. (2006), nevertheless, unearthed that more affectionate behavior that is sexuale.g. Handholding, hugging, kissing, & massage treatments) took place if they had been buddies than once they had been acquaintances or strangers (Grello, et al. 2006). Hence, the restricted research recommends that intercourse can vary across different varieties of nonromantic lovers.

Not merely have many detectives failed to distinguish among kinds of nonromantic lovers, but in addition they’ve perhaps maybe not typically distinguished among different sorts of intimate behavior. Intercourse will not happen in around 60% of hook-ups (Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000). Various intimate habits include different degrees of chance of sexually transmitted conditions. The the sort of intimate behavior that common does occur additionally varies as being a function associated with kind of intimate partner (Grello et al,, 2006). Finally, genital, heavy nongenital, and light nongenital intimate behavior are differentially linked to representations of intimate relationships (Jones & Furman, in press). These findings declare that it is critical to differentiate among various kinds of intimate behavior.