Select Page

Rectal intercourse therefore the threat of HIV transmission

Key points

  • The estimated risk of infection is zero for unprotected anal intercourse with an HIV-positive partner with a fully suppressed viral load.
  • If HIV isn’t completely suppressed by effective therapy, anal sex without condoms is a high-risk route of intimate HIV transmission for the insertive and partner that is receptive.
  • Intimately sent infections while the HIV-positive partner being recently contaminated raise the threat of transmission.

In the event that HIV-positive partner is using antiretroviral therapy and has now a completely suppressed viral load (‘undetectable’), the possibility of HIV transmission through anal sex is zero.

The PARTNER-2 research used 783 male partners when the partner that is HIV-positive an undetectable viral load with no condoms were utilized in anal sex. No HIV transmission from HIV-positive partners took place and the researchers concluded that wife from honduran the risk of HIV transmission in these circumstances was effectively zero (Rodger) after 1596 couple-years of follow-up and 77,000 acts of unprotected anal intercourse.

If viral load is detectable, condomless intercourse that is anal a extremely efficient means of transmitting HIV, and it’s also considered a high-risk task both for lovers, even though the precise level of risk can rely on numerous facets.

The risk of infection has been estimated at 1.38% (one in 72 chance) and 0.11% (one in 909 chance) for the receptive and insertive partners respectively for each condomless act with an untreated HIV-positive partner.

Nevertheless, it could be 10 to 25 times greater in the event that good partner is recently contaminated. Research reports have identified some other factors that further boost the threat of transmission.

Risks to insertive and receptive lovers

There clearly was a belief that is widespread homosexual males that the insertive partner (‘top’) are at suprisingly low danger of HIV disease. It is a fact that HIV illness happens less frequently in males whom entirely make the role that is insertive in males whom participate in both functions, or males whom practise receptive anal sex only (Jin).

But, being the insertive partner in condomless sex stays a high-risk task. The per-act danger for the insertive partner in anal intercourse is related to the per-act danger for a man (insertive) partner in vaginal intercourse.

The receptive partner (‘bottom’) are at chance of infection from HIV within the semen and pre-seminal liquids (‘pre-cum’) regarding the contaminated partner. Rectal muscle is delicate and simply damaged, which could supply the virus access that is direct the bloodstream. Nevertheless, such damaged tissues is certainly not required for illness to take place: the rectal muscle it self is abundant with cells that are straight prone to disease.

The insertive partner (‘top’) can be prone to disease, as you will find high quantities of HIV in rectal secretions, also blood through the rectal tissues (Zuckerman). This creates a threat of transmission to your insertive partner through the muscle into the urethra as well as on your head for the penis – particularly underneath the foreskin.

Several systematic reviews of studies have determined that condomless receptive rectal intercourse posed more or less ten to twelve times greater chance of illness than insertive rectal intercourse.

Insertive anal sex refers towards the work of penetration during rectal intercourse. The insertive partner is the ‘top’.

The past area of the big intestine simply above the anal area.

viral load

Dimension for the amount of virus in a bloodstream sample, reported as amount of HIV RNA copies per milliliter of bloodstream plasma. The VL is an indicator that is important of development as well as how good treatment solutions are working.

intimately sent infections (STIs)

Although HIV could be intimately sent, the expression is oftentimes utilized to chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, herpes, scabies, trichomonas vaginalis, etc.

Receptive rectal intercourse relates towards the work to be penetrated during anal sex. The partner that is receptive the ‘bottom’.

The most up-to-date post on the evidence estimated that for every condomless work with an HIV-positive partner, the possibility of disease had been 1.38percent ( one in 72 opportunity) when it comes to receptive partner and 0.11% ( one in 909 opportunity) for the insertive partner (Patel).

However, a number of the studies had been performed before antiretroviral therapy after diagnosis became the norm and are also very likely to over-estimate the possibility of illness.

Rectal intercourse between women and men

Anal intercourse between women and men has generally perhaps maybe not gotten just as much attention as anal sex between males. But, there clearly was proof that rectal intercourse is practised by more and more intimately adults that are active. This season, 11percent of females and 13% of males in the uk report having intercourse that is anal the last 12 months, with more youthful generations being almost certainly going to report it (Mercer).

Unprotected anal that is heterosexual probably plays a crucial role in HIV transmission among heterosexuals, although dependable quotes miss (Baggaley).

Present disease

The very first couple of weeks or months after HIV has entered a body that is person’s their viral load is normally exceedingly high plus they are really infectious.

Viral load could be the term utilized to explain the actual quantity of HIV circulating in your body. As viral load rises, therefore does infectiousness. Having said that, whenever viral load is therefore low as become invisible, there isn’t any danger at each of HIV transmission.

For instance, a research of heterosexual partners in Rakai, Uganda, where one partner had been HIV good therefore the other HIV negative in the very beginning of the research, revealed that the chances of HIV transmission is greatest in the 1st two . 5 months after initial infection with HIV, and that this correlated with greater viral load amounts in very early HIV infection. The scientists estimated that in accordance with infection that is chronic infectiousness during main illness ended up being improved 26-fold (Hollingsworth).

As folks are often unacquainted with their infection at this time, they may not be treatment that is taking may unintentionally expose intimate lovers to HIV. Those that have HIV without realising it are much very likely to be concerned in HIV transmission than those who understand they will have HIV, given that latter can get therapy.

Intimately sent infections

Many sexually transmitted infections, particularly those that result ulceration, including herpes simplex 2 (HSV-2), syphilis, gonorrhoea, and chlamydia, increase HIV-negative partners’ danger of acquiring HIV during genital sexual intercourse. HIV-negative individuals with recurrent STIs could be at increased ongoing threat of HIV infection.

In individuals coping with HIV who aren’t using HIV therapy, STIs additionally trigger increased genital shedding of HIV, which escalates the chance of transmitting HIV to other people. Nevertheless, STIs try not to raise the chance of HIV transmission from those who are using effective HIV therapy and possess an invisible viral load. Within the PARTNER research, there clearly was maybe maybe not just a single hiv transmission despite the fact that many research individuals had STIs.

There’s two reasons that are main the effect of STIs on HIV transmission. Firstly, numerous (but not all) STIs causes ulcers, sores or lesions. They give you an immediate real path of entry for HIV in a uninfected individual. Next, resistant cells being, by themselves, prone to HIV infection – such as activated T-cells and dendritic cells – are vulnerable to be there in greater numbers in the web site of a illness.

“Being the insertive partner in condomless intercourse stays a high-risk task.”

The strongest proof is for herpes virus type 2 (HSV-2). A meta-analysis unearthed that having HSV-2 had been connected with a heightened danger of acquiring HIV in both the population that is generala growth of 270%) plus in greater risk teams such as for instance intercourse employees and males who possess intercourse with males (170%). Having A hsv-2 that is recent had been related to an nearly fivefold (470%) increased chance of acquiring HIV, most likely because vaginal ulceration, viral shedding and irritation into the vaginal tract are undesirable in brand new HSV-2 infections and have a tendency to decrease in the long run (Looker).

Individual papillomavirus (HPV), the reason for genital warts, is connected with an elevated danger of HIV disease in females whether or not it really is an HPV kind that triggers warts that are genital a kind connected with cervical cancer (Houlihan). The existence of HPV in cells within the penis additionally advances the danger of purchase in guys (Rositch).


Poppers are nitrite-based inhalants, trusted as a leisure medication by homosexual males in lots of nations. Particularly popular for usage during receptive rectal intercourse, sniffing poppers relaxes the rectal sphincter muscle tissue, making sexual intercourse easier and intensifying pleasure.

Nonetheless, utilizing poppers during unprotected, receptive intercourse that is anal than doubles the possibility of HIV infection (Macdonald). This might be because poppers enhance blood circulation to your rectal cells, heightening their susceptibility to illness. Poppers usually do not impact the partner that is insertive threat of disease.

Rectal douching

Rectal douching may be the insertion of the fluid, such as for instance regular water or soapsuds, in to the anus via an instrument, to clean the rectum before or after anal intercourse and it is a typical task among homosexual and bisexual guys. But, it might probably harm the lining that is rectal remove protective obviously occurring germs. If the exact same douching light bulb, showerhead or other tool is used by differing people, infections is also transmitted in that way.

A synthesis of 24 studies revealed that rectal douching had been related to an almost threefold increased likelihood of disease with HIV and a far more than twofold rise in the possibility of an infection that is sexually transmitted than HIV (Li).

Although it is feasible that this result could merely be due to differences that are behavioural all of the studies done multiple analyses to consider possible confounders such as regularity of intercourse and partner figures.

Rectal blood

Anal bleeding additionally raises the possibility of infection, and may be due to haemorrhoids, particular STIs such as for instance anal warts, herpes lesions, the previous utilization of intercourse toys, or by fingering and fisting.

Male circumcision

There are a few data from low and middle-income nations to claim that circumcision might be protective, but only for guys who solely use the insertive part (Yuan).