Select Page

North Dakota ‘Historic Racing’ Machine Bill Poses Threat to State’s Charitable Gambling Industry

North Dakota’s plans to expand gambling by creating up to six state-owned gambling enterprises have actually been grabbing the headlines within the neighborhood news, due to the probable impact on tribal and charitable gaming operators.

‘Instant racing’ uses principles of parimutuel wagering, but has faced legal challenges in the handful of states where it’s been introduced as being, in fact, a slot machine that is glorified.

However now an under-the-radar bill, spotted by regional radio host Mike McFeeley this week, poses an additional danger to your 300-odd charitable gambling locations in bars and clubs over the state.

Senate Bill 2221 would authorize ‘historic racing’ or ‘instant racing’ machines at up to ten locations in the Peace Garden State. These machines allow gamblers to place bets on races that have been run.

Video of races from around the global world are saved, and a race is played at random as soon as bets have actually been placed. The names associated with the horses and times and places for the races, are, of course, hidden from the bettor.

Slot or otherwise Not?

Ostensibly, the machines are designed to simulate a day at the races for the bettor that is happy-go-lucky but there’s also another, less obvious reason for their existence. Because these events are classed as parimutuel betting, with multiple players causing a pool, they are not defined as ‘slots,’ or casino gaming.

At least that’s the basic concept, although it’sn’t constantly resolved quite so neatly. In 2006, instant race ended up being prohibited in Wyoming after their state Supreme Court ruled that ‘a video slot that tries to mimic traditional parimutuel betting’ is still, at the conclusion of the afternoon, a video slot.

As McFeeley points out, it may be tough to be a long-term champion at real-world racing, but at the least you can study the proper execution, which calls for knowledge and ability. Not so with instant racing, where you can even ask the machine to select a horse at random for you if you get bored and select not to accomplish it yourself, just like a lotto ticket.

Horse Racing Wins

Nevertheless the most significant point is, as the machines are defined as parimutuel betting, proceeds goes very nearly entirely to the horse rushing industry. And SB 2221 expects $200 million per year to be wagered on the machines, if the bill passes muster in the state.

That’s $200 million that might otherwise be spent on charitable video gaming, to be bet instead on devices which have faced legal challenges in other states regarding the grounds that they’re slots in disguise.

Speaking early in the day this week at a hearing associated with the House Judiciary Committee for the proposal to create casinos that are state-owned Jonathan Jorgensen, president of the board of directors for the Charitable Gaming Association of North Dakota, warned against an ill-conceived ‘explosion of video gaming’ in the state.

Former Pennsylvania State Representative Accused of Misappropriation Claims Gambling Addiction

Jesse White, a former Pennsylvania that is democratic State, ended up being suspended from exercising law by the State Supreme Court on Wednesday for the so-called misappropriation of their clients’ funds.

Former Pennsylvania representative Jesse White is accused of misspending $96,000 of his clients’ funds in the half that is second of. This past year he was sued by his mother that is own for opening a credit card account inside her name. (Image: KDKA)

‘Mr White has been placed on crisis suspension that is temporary this Commonwealth after it has been discovered that their continued practice of law is causing instant and substantial general public or private harm,’ read a court statement this week.

The Supreme Court order says White misspent more than $96,000 in funds, although he’s not been charged with a crime.

The court found that in the half that is last of, he spent all but $12,000 of money entrusted him to him by clients on things totally unrelated to his representing them.

Fracking Internet Troll

The former Representative for Pennsylvania’s 46th District tried to block the suspension of his law permit, arguing that he was being treated for ‘pathological gambling addiction.’ The transfers had been ‘all related to the gambling addiction,’ he said.

White served in the Pennsylvania legislature from 2007 to 2014 but his reputation had been tarnished by revelations in the press in 2013 he used to harass people that he had created a number of fictitious online personas, including a young blond woman by the name of ‘Ashley Jackson,’ which.

According to one pro-fracking writer, White created ‘an army’ of fake social networking accounts, through which he would troll and insult governmental opponents and others who disagreed with his staunch anti-fracking views.

Reports at the time noted that all persona had a personality that is distinct. Most ‘young women’ he created, as an example, were flirtatious, while ‘Texas Timmy Solobay’ would make crude remarks that are sexist women.

He was ousted by Republican newcomer Jason Ortitay in the following year’s elections.

White also once destroyed a libel claim against a small neighborhood Pennsylvania magazine which claimed he had set one of his very own campaign signs on fire.

Sued By His Mom

A year ago White ended up being sued by their very own mother, who accused him of stealing her identity to open a charge card account on which he racked up $27,000 in charges.

Expenses included Pittsburgh Penguin seats, as well as his destination that is own wedding Las vegas, nevada.

White said his mother had opened the credit account on his behalf over a ten years ago to help him set up his law practice. He claimed the lawsuit was a ‘vindictive’ reaction to a dispute over babysitting rights.

Colombia Blocks 325 Unlicensed Online Gambling Domains Whenever Operators Refuse to Pay Up

Colombia includes a track record of extreme violence and massive illegal drug trade, and neither problem seems anywhere close to being curtailed. But regarding online gambling, the South American country is taking an approach that is hardline cracking down on unlawful internet casino platforms.

While hardly the South American nation’s biggest issue when it comes to policing, Colombia wants on line gaming operators to pay up or move out, and it is banning a huge selection of web sites, including many well-known names, that have actually refused to pay for the piper. (Image: Insight Crime)

Last week, Coljuegos, the South American country’s gambling regulator, announced the synthesis of an on-line gambling blacklist that comprises 325 websites being now banned by the government that is federal.

The catalog of domain names features several of the most famous interactive gambling companies, including William Hill, PokerStars, Betfair, Paddy energy, and Ladbrokes, to call just a couple of.

The blockage is in response to your country legalizing online gambling last October, albeit at a cost to operators that most appear unwilling to pay for. A high six-figure certification fee and a nearly 20 percent tax on revenues, has kept the majority of operators opting to keep offering their items to Colombians, but from overseas headquarters.

Colombia has land-based casinos spread throughout the country, using the concentration that is heaviest in the money city of Bogota.

Flawed Bill

Colombia was at the forefront of taking steps to finally regulate on the web gambling, as it became one of the first Latin American countries to approve legislation for the industry that is digital. But in hindsight, the law it endorsed ended up being severely unsound.

The first and a lot of issue that is critical the country’s decision to impose a licensing charge for online gaming operators that exceeded $160,000. Taking into consideration the average wage that is annual a Colombian is under $14,000 according to the World Bank, and presumably don’t have massive bankrolls to spare gambling, few operators had been excited to hold therefore much at the outset without any guarantee of ROI.

On top of the high permit fee, Colombia also instituted a 16 % value-added tax (VAT) on player deposits. Two months after the statutory legislation was passed away, the government rid the VAT tariff in response to concerns presented from gambling operators. But despite the deposit elimination, video gaming revenue is still taxed at 15 %, and gaming sites are refusing to agree with the legalized game.

‘All of those things add cost to entering a market whether is going to be viable,’ Remote Gambling Association (RGA) CEO Clive Hawkswood told Gambling Compliance last fall that we don’t know. The RGA is A london-based trade association that represents the interests of European internet gambling entities.

Bigger Fish to Fry

To operate and promote to its citizens, Bogota wants to first get a check that is six-figure each site purveyor. But based on Colombia’s track record, it appears dubious at best whether or perhaps not it will be more effective at policing gaming that is online than it is at curtailing other illegal enterprises.

The US Department of State names Colombia as a ‘major illicit drug producing and/or drug-transit country.’ Colombia can be identified as being a major supply of cultivating essential chemical substances which can be used into the manufacturing of illegal narcotics, and can also be a country whose financial institutions engage in cash laundering.

And of course, with drugs comes crime.

‘Despite significant decreases in overall crime in Colombia, continued vigilance is warranted due to a rise in recent months of violent crime, including crime causing the deaths of americans,’ their state Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs says in its warning of travel towards the South American country.

Connecticut Battles It Out with Massachusetts, But First, Must Untangle Its Own Internal Fight

It’s the battle of Connecticut v. Massachusetts, but not until the Constitution State figures out an internal plan that will hold its very own against MGM Resorts’ planned Springfield casino in the state that is neighboring.

Sen. Tim Larson Hartford that is(D-East Rep. Joseph Verrengia (D-West Hartford) are co-chairman for a committee to explore the possibility of A connecticut that is third casino. (Image:

An step that is early the method revealed how divided hawaii’s legislators had been and how that might threaten to derail advocates’ hopes. The Public Safety and Security Committee agreed the concept had a need to move forward, but did not give an endorsement to any for the three options.

‘It signifies essential this dilemma is, but it also highlights how divided the legislators are on this really issue that is important’ said Rep. Joseph Verrengia, (D-West Hartford), co-chair for the committee. ‘That’s why the conversation has to continue.’

This, That, or the Other

Dueling bills are making their means through the homely House and Senate and both leave little room for compromise. The item that is only agree on is in which the resort would be, that will be East Windsor, 16 miles from the MGM resort in Springfield that’s scheduled to start in September.

The Senate’s version would provide rights that are exclusive two federally recognized Indian tribes, the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan nations. Both own and operate a facility in the state and this would be considered a venture that is joint but perhaps not on native land.

The House wants to open the bidding up for competition, but some warn of a possible legal conflict since the casino wouldn’t be on Native American land.

The third option would be to ignore the bills and do nothing, but most everyone agrees this is the least desirable path.

Border Wars

The strategy behind the third gambling house was to counter the MGM building that could impact Connecticut and take away market share through the tribes. The conglomerate has identified Hartford as a target for customers for its development.

‘ There are many more than 9,000 jobs and millions in tax revenue at stake for hawaii,’ Rodney Butler, chairman of the Mashantucket Pequot tribal country, told the CT Mirror. ‘Today’s vote takes us one step nearer to keeping both right here in Connecticut.’

Further complicating the problem is a report through the state’s attorney general that warned allowing the tribes to jointly operate a casino, but off tribal lands, would pose legal risks.

But the option of lacking a casino that is third to be growing. State Representative Daniel S. Rovero (D-Killingly) believes it is the wise method to go, to prevent risk that is unnecessary.

‘I don’t wish to take that chance,’ Rovero said. ‘If I did, I should be at the gambling enterprises more often,’ he noted wryly.