Select Page

New Jersey Online Gambling Revenue Drops for First Time

New Jersey’s Atlantic City casinos saw online gambling profits fall for the time that is first April. (Image:

While the profits from New Jersey’s emerging gambling that is online have already been little, most observers have actually remained positive about the long-term leads for Internet gambling in their state. Each month, suggesting that steady growth could be expected for some time after all, since the launch of the sites in November of last year, online casino and poker games have brought in more and more money.

But that streak is now at a finish. Web gambling revenues were down slightly for New Jersey in falling to a total of $11.4 million for the month april. That’s of a half-million less than in March, when the web sites introduced $11.9 million.

An element of the reason with this is the fact that April had one less day than March. But it doesn’t inform the story that is whole the average take daily was also down extremely somewhat, falling from $383,173 in March to $380,958 in April.

This uses strong gains in recent months. Both January and March saw double-digit monthly gains over past months, while even February the quickest month of the season saw a nine percent enhance over January.

Good Weather, Payment Issues Cited

Officials cited possible reasons for the decrease, while remaining upbeat about the long term of on line gambling in the state.

‘Maybe when the weather was nice, the laptops got closed and folks decided to come down to Atlantic City,’ said Matt Levinson, chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission. Levinson additionally cited the continued difficulties with bank card deposits as a major factor.

‘It just takes time when launching a new business,’ stated Joe Lupo, senior vice president of the Borgata casino. Lupo also cited the re payment processing problems as a problem, whilst also noting that increased options that are mobile phones and pills will ultimately help enhance revenues going forward.

Even as we’ve recently reported, as many as half or more of most credit and debit card transactions to New Jersey online casinos have already been rejected by the banks issuing those cards. The problem has been more prevalent with Visa cards than MasterCard products, while American Express and Discover do not accept any online gambling deals.

Overall, the Borgata has still been the largest on line gambling winner in 2014, ingesting $16.4 million this year. Caesars Interactive has made $13.1 million to date, as the Tropicana has already established revenues of $6.2 million. All the sites have made under $3 million since January.

Overall Revenues for Casinos Up

While online casino winnings may have stalled for the month, they still helped increase revenues that are overall Atlantic City casinos. The sum total take combining live and online winnings was up 3.2 percent to $235.9 million. That’s inspite of the known fact that revenues from brick-and-mortar casinos had been down 1.8 per cent year-over-year, though that number changes to a 3.3 percent increase if you discount final 12 months’s revenues through the Atlantic Club, which can be no longer in operation.

The increase that is biggest originated in the struggling Revel Casino Hotel, which saw revenues jump 55 percent from last year. Other winners were the Golden Nugget, Caesars, and Borgata. Meanwhile, Trump Plaza saw a decline of 26 percent, the worst of any casino in the town.

New York Casinos Set $350 Million Minimum for Prized Locations

Scenic Orange County in New York State is now a hotly contested location for casino designers. (Image: Catholic Charities Orange County)

We’re still at least a few years away from the casino that is real proposed in nyc City, plus it’s hard to imagine exactly how competitive and costly the fight for that license will be. The most desirable locations in New York State are those closest to the city, and developers expected to have to invest significantly to earn the rights to build there until that time. Nevertheless the state has released their minimal figures, and they’re lower than most anticipated far too low, according to some.

Brand New York gambling regulators have announced that anyone wanting to create a casino in Orange or Dutchess County both locations that would be approximately a full hour north of NYC will need to agree to spending at the very least $350 million in the project. That doesn’t include other fees for buying land or financing the project, making the real minimum close to $500 million, according to quotes by the Gambling Facility Location Board.

Figure Lower Than Expected

That’s not exactly a drop in the bucket, and it’s enough to make sure that only developers that are serious bother staying in the bidding process. However in a day and age when casino resort tasks are usually multibillion buck investments, the quantity for the location that is best in upstate brand New York strikes some as rather low.

‘it is thought by me shows they are rushing through this and that this has clearly not been thought out,’ stated Mitchell Grossinger Etess of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which would like to build a casino near Monticello. ‘The premium spot, in addition they are just asking $350 million? It doesn’t speak to producing financial development.’

The disappointment within the figure had been strongest among lawmakers in Sullivan and Ulster Counties. Those areas border Orange and Dutchess Counties, but are farther away from ny City. Officials there had hoped that the state would put a very high cost on building in many desirable locations, which in turn might persuade some developers to find a cheaper option inside their counties.

Lower Minimums in Other Areas

A license in the others of ‘Region 1’ which includes Sullivan, Ulster, Columbia, Delaware and Greene Counties would demand a investment that is minimum of $130 million. That number would drop further to $100 million if another license were directed at build in Dutchess County or Orange County. Other places around the continuing state had minimums set between $70 million and $135 million.

But even with those relatively low numbers, many fear that if a casino were integrated Dutchess or Orange, it would be quite difficult to find a firm willing to compete keenly against them in the Catskills.

Certainly, the $350 million cost is not scaring anybody away. Major businesses such as Genting and Caesars Entertainment have stated that a $350 million investment in an Orange County casino doesn’t trouble them at all. Even a minor player like Greenetrack has proposed building a $500 million casino in the area, well above the necessary minimum.

An overall total of 22 groups submitted $1 million application fees become considered for casino licenses in another of several areas of upstate New York. The operators were given five business days to back out and receive a full refund if they wished to do so after hearing the minimum investment thresholds.

Gambling State Legislators Release iGaming Policy Framework

James Waldman and other US lawmakers want states to regulate gambling that is online their very own. (Image:

If you’ve been following our protection of on the web gaming lately, you know that there exists a battle that is fierce at minimum behind the scenes over the future of Web gambling in the usa. Teams such as Sheldon Adelson’s Coalition to get rid of Internet Gambling (C2SIG) are looking for a federal ban of online casinos, although some are looking for legislation that would create a federal system for online poker or other games.

But those aren’t the only options on the table, plus some legislators are attempting to press forward along with other solutions that are potential. One plan that is such simply released by the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States (NCLGS), a group of lawmakers from states that have large stake in the gambling industry.

The policy framework, which is currently in a draft form, had been only released after talking with number of different groups and stakeholders in the gaming industry. That included the National Indian Gaming Association, the American Gaming Association, and the National Council on Problem Gambling. The policy statement understood as Policy Framework for the Regulation of Internet Gaming comes in response to a public consultation that the NCLGS launched last December.

A Model for States to Think About

The concept is for the policy framework become used as a model of states considering adding online gambling to their gaming options. It covers a true number of policy conditions that tend to be difficult for states to contend with, such as player protection, geolocation and individual verification, and agreements between various jurisdictions, such as for example player-sharing compacts.

‘As a team of legislators responsible for sound video gaming public policy in our respective states, NCLGS acknowledges the threats, plus the possibilities, tangled up in new technology and online video gaming,’ stated James Waldman, president of the NCLGS. ‘NCLGS wants to ensure that an system that is effective in position for people who do enable intrastate Internet gaming and that policy requirements have been in spot to market security and uniformity in states that could wish to form interstate Web compacts.’

Legislators Oppose Federal Ban

Once the nature of this policy draft indicates, the NCLGS has arrived out against any federal ban on online gambling. However, the group has additionally made it understood they’re not looking for federal regulation, either. Instead, they do say that allowing states to control gambling that is online they have actually typically done with other kinds of video gaming such as for example horse racing, casinos and lotteries is the most effective way to handle the industry.

‘States have the expertise, developed over numerous many years of experience, to oversee gaming for the best results to the states and their consumers,’ Waldman published last month in a letter to Congressional leaders. ‘It is our strong conviction, as legislators who chair and are people of this legislative committees that work faithfully to develop sound public video gaming policy, that states are the most likely entity to choose, and oversee, what kind of gaming should occur and what should maybe not within their borders.’

The insurance policy framework just isn’t yet in its last form, and is currently open to comment. It’ll be evaluated at the NCLGS Summer Meeting, that will be held in San Diego from 6 to 8 june.