Select Page

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

A rendering that is 3-D of proposed Suffolk Downs casino, now planned for Revere with partner Mohegan Sun (Image: Wendy Maeda/Boston Globe)

They do say the household always wins, and appropriate now, prospective casino operators Suffolk Downs and Mohegan Sun are undoubtedly on a winning streak in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission unanimously authorized a waiver to the deadline that is standing operators to file applications including certified referendum results from their host communities by the end of the season.

Longer, The Following Year

That December 31 deadline was likely to be a real problem with the Suffolk Downs casino proposal. A chance to build a casino solely on land in the town of Revere, it also agreed that the original vote taken earlier this year was for a substantially different proposal while the gaming commission was willing to allow the race track and partner Mohegan Sun. As such, a vote that is new needed the one that would not have the ability to be held before the year-end deadline.

The decision was one which the panel said they made in an attempt become because fair as possible to all sides. On November 5, both East Boston and Revere voted on whether or not to approve a Suffolk Downs casino that would have been primarily and almost entirely found on the Boston side of the edge between your two communities. East Boston residents voted against that proposition, while Revere voters overwhelmingly approved it.

That left a whole lot of outstanding questions that are legal probably the most essential of that was whether Suffolk Downs could now build a casino entirely on land in Revere, which had authorized a casino. The choices since that time have essentially stated that the answer is ‘yes’ but that it’ll be treated as a unique project that have to be re-approved, separately from the proposal that is previous.

‘We have actually wrestled hard with trying to puzzle out just how to reconcile the ‘no’ vote in East Boston with the ‘yes’ vote in Revere, and there is no perfect solution,’ said Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby.

The waiver was the closest to that ‘perfect solution’ that the payment could appear with, thinking about the deadline that is tight. Mohegan Sun must still file their application as being a possible operator by the conclusion of 2013, however a second referendum in Revere will take destination sometime within the next 90 days after the original deadline.

Boston Fires Back

Boston officials opposed the waiver, saying that the vote in East Boston should be ‘respected and maintained’ in a page to the commission. In addition, incoming Boston Mayor-elect Martin Walsh has stated that he’s gotn’t yet ruled out of the possibility of taking action that is legal this second casino proposal in Revere.

But Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has expressed confidence that the residents of his city will not only get to vote regarding the new casino proposal, but that they’ll back it aided by the same types of support they did the initial time around. On 5, 61 percent of Revere voters agreed to endorse the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, though it’s not clear if that support will increase or fall now that the casino will actually be in Revere november.

Should the new proposal gain approval from voters and regulators, it will end up being the second project to compete for the one available eastern Massachusetts casino permit. One other casino proposition in that area is situated in Everett, and would be operated by winner casino signup bonus Wynn Resorts. That project just passed the suitability quotient for the gaming payment’s investigations.

Polish Computer Programmers Sentenced for Cyber Blackmail Threats

They might look happy and carefree here, but Polish computer coders Patryk Surmacki, 35 (left) and Piotr Smirnow, 31 (right) meant no good if they authorized attacks that are cyber two casino sites (Image: Cavendish Press)

Two Polish computer programmers who attempted to blackmail two major unnamed online casino sites one in the UK and something in america have actually now been sentenced to jail, after a police sting nabbed the pair earlier this year.

False Pretenses

Piotr Smirnow, 31, and Patryk Surmacki, 35, approached who owns great britain site and requested a gathering. The victim who owns A internet that is manchester-based casino met the pair underneath the knowing that Smirnow had a business proposition for him. The pair had been known by him for four years before the proposed company meeting, according to police reports.

But things took an unsightly turn when, during the meeting which took spot at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5 the computer programmers demanded a 50 % share for the man’s business and threatened to take the casino site down’s servers if he declined.

The set told the master that they knew a notorious computer hacker by the name of ‘Wapo’ within the U.S., who they claimed would carry out the cyber-attack on the business’s servers if the pair paid him to do so, thus stopping the operations of the company.

Understood as being a ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS), the court was told that the attack is with the capacity of decreasing also the many advanced of websites by overwhelming them by way of a mass attack of the company’s computer servers.

Cyber Hacker Repaid

As the business owner refused to hand over 50 percent of their company, Smirnow and Surmacki completed their threat on August 2nd and paid the American that is cloaked hacker;12,000 ($19,700) to complete their dirty work. The Manchester-based site went down for five hours, costing the company £15,000 ($24,558) when no clients could access the website during that time.

The victim had currently alerted Manchester police to the duo’s hazard, however, and another meeting was set up in a bugged hotel room next to Heathrow Airport on August 7th.

When the owner of the business told the pair that he would not cooperate using them, they told him they had been ‘going to war’ and were then arrested by police who had been on standby.

Smirnow additionally admitted that he had carried out an identical attack on an American victim through a Skype call, during which he stated that they had ‘enough power so individuals can’t take to to push us around anymore,’ leading Detective Inspector Mossop to the comprehending that the investigation had taken down an ’emerging global cyber threat.’ This time the victim had been a U.S.-based gaming platform that enables 100 casino sites worldwide.

As for the U.S. webmasters, they clearly dodged a bullet.

‘This case made me worry for my safety that is personal well as for future years of my company. Which is why I felt compelled to take action against the perpetrators,’ stated who owns the casino that is manchester-based, which is calculated to be worth £30 million ($49,143,000). It is projected that a week-long assault on ecommerce might have cost the site owner a $600,000 loss, based on court reports.

‘No one should have to succumb to blackmail and also this sentence should act as a warning to those associated with cyber extortion that the police and the courts will view this sort of conduct very really,’ the site owner added.

Smirnow and Surmacki later pleaded bad to two charges of blackmail and acts that are unauthorized computers, and were sentenced to five years and four months each by Judge Michael Henshaw at the Manchester court. Their own defense team described their attempted blackmail as ‘bizarre, misconceived, naïve and brazen.’

‘They used their intimate, expert knowledge of online business to bully the victims into submission,’ revealed Detective Inspector Chris Mossop associated with Organised Crime that is serious Division. ‘ But make no blunder, they may were using the newest technology, but this was merely good antique blackmail.’

Affinity Gaming Hit with Target-Style Security Breach

Nevada and casino that is regional Affinity Gaming happens to be struck having a credit and debit card security breach.

It’s not been a week that is good the industry that supposedly safeguards our credit and debit card transactions. Simply days after a nationwide scandal that pulled in the Secret Service to investigate a massive system hack at popular retailer Target a breach that could result in fake charges, identity theft, or worse Las Vegas-based casino business Affinity Gaming appears to have been hit by having a comparable fiasco.

Credit-Processing Techniques Compromised

Affinity announced that their credit and debit-processing systems had been hacked by the weekend’s start, and were telling their clients most close that is likely 300,000 of whom could have been hit by the hacking to watch their credit info as well as any unauthorized charges to their accounts.

Precisely what everyone wants to worry about after blowing their holiday bankroll, right?

But wait, it gets far worse. All the way through to October 16: that’s seven months while Target’s breach spanned approximately five weeks from around Thanksgiving to a week before Christmas Affinity says theirs hit all 12 of their properties in four U.S. states, and that the breach continued unabated from March 14 of this year. Incorporated into the properties affected were the business’s popular Nevada stateline gambling enterprises, including Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s, and Primm Valley Resort and Casino.

According to outside legal counsel for Affinity, James Prendergast, the cyber-hack ended up being from a ‘very sophisticated piece of spyware that got in to a terrible location. It got contained and eliminated and we called in third-party investigators that are forensic confirmation that it was gone,’ Prendergast noted.

Not a way to understand Who Got Hit

Adding to the confusion, because Affinity doesn’t store any consumer bank card information in their databases, they do not have method of knowing or notifying whom might have been afflicted with the online world theft. But with casinos scattered throughout Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and Iowa, it most probably could affect a consumer that is nearly nationwide, particularly as several gambling enterprises come in or near Las Vegas.

And if you occurred to pump gasoline at Affinity’s Primm Center petrol Station a significant stopping point at Nevada’s stateline into California you might like to maintain difficulty, because that company’s credit and debit processing systems were also hacked, starting on an as-yet-undetermined date and ending on November 29.

So far, the way that is only has been able to notify customers of any possible problems is on their particular internet site with a ‘public notice of information security event,’ but needless to say, many who may have been hit will never see that.

Both of whom have been notified, it definitely gets the attention of state regulatory agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board while hacking of this scope can fall under the purview of the Secret Service and the FBI. GCB Chairman A.G. Burnett says their organization let the Nevada Gaming Commission know of the dilemmas immediately.

‘The business promptly notified us of what happened,’ Burnett explained. ‘They are dealing with us closely.’

As for Affinity, aside from their site notice and media attention, they are doingn’t have plenty of means to allow clients know what’s occurred or how to proceed about this, but in a statement said that ‘Affinity regrets any inconvenience this incident may cause and has generated a confidential, toll-free inquiry line to assist its customers.’

That line, in the event that you think you may have been impacted, is open from 8 am to 6 pm Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays. The number to call for U.S. or Canadian residents is 877-238-2179; all the international residents should call Affinity at +1-814-201-3696.

‘Affinity is cooperating in the ongoing law enforcement investigation of this incident,’ a business statement read. ‘Affinity has also taken a number of measures to strengthen the security of our community and contains worked with legal and security vulnerability professionals to help identify and implement additional appropriate safeguards.’