Select Page

Mansion Poker to Keep UK, Other Mansion Items Remain

Mansion Group says that it’ll still be operating casino websites in the UK, but the company’s poker offering will be closed this thirty days.

Although Mansion Poker is shipping out of the British market that is online Mansion Group is far from the only operator to balk during the new income tax regime that the uk is implementing for online gambling. This is exactly why many people believed it whenever reports surfaced that the firm had been planning a withdrawal that is full great britain market. It turns out that those reports may have been a bit premature, though one or more Mansion item will soon become unavailable to British customers.

The Mansion Group released a declaration on Wednesday doubting reports that they are leaving the united kingdom market, rather saying that they are in the process to gain an online gambling license under the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act. However, this procedure will not consist of the group’s online poker room, which is closing down on today, September 15.

All Casino Sites to Remain Open

‘In contrast to current reports, Mansion Group want to verify that none of the casino that is online in their portfolio;,,, and, will be exiting the UK market,’ read a statement from the Mansion Group. ‘Business in Mansion Group casino brands will continue as usual throughout the UK licence application process.’

However, the statement did confirm that the poker space would be closing, and an email to British players offered customers instructions on how to proceed.

Poker Players Advised to Change Sites

‘Due to changing regulations regarding gaming that is online the uk, we must inform you that Mansion Poker is needed to close its doorways to UK players on September 15th, 2014,’ the e-mail read. ‘As a result, we kindly request that you withdraw any and all sorts of funds you have in your Mansion Poker account.’

Players were advised to move their accounts to Titanbet Poker. The email said that players could transfer their loyalty rewards towards the Titanbet site.

The closure for the poker space is a minor event: in the team’s statement, they mentioned that it ‘accounts for a very marginal part of Mansion Group. in the situation of the Mansion Group’ but, it is unlikely that this may function as the only casualty in the UK market because of the brand new regulations taking hold there.

Firms Considering New Tax Rates, Regulatory Requirements

Under the new regulations, any company that desires to offer online gambling solutions in the UK must apply for a license. They shall also be susceptible to a 15 percent point-of-consumption tax that will apply to any gambling carried out by UK residents. This means a much higher income tax rate for companies based in jurisdictions such as Gibraltar therefore the Isle of Man. Operators will also be scrutinized over their operations that are worldwide with poker operators being expected to ensure that identity checks are constant across shared networks.

These and other provisions have already chased some operators away from the marketplace, particularly individuals with limited player bases in the UK. Based on SBOBet, a company located in the Isle of Man, all records at their sites are going to be closed by September 15, along with account balances refunded by the end associated with the month. 12BET may also be closing its sports that are online in great britain by the end of September, though it’s going to still run its casino site.

Singapore Pushes for Online Gambling Limitations

Despite being one of those many gambling that is prolific on Earth, Singapore is considering online gambling restrictions. (Image:

Singapore is already known for having strict laws that are designed to curb social ills, so you might be surprised to find that the city-state doesn’t yet have any regulations for online gambling. But that’s about to change, being a bill that is new remote gaming has been read in the Singapore parliament and promises sweeping restrictions on the industry.

The bill that is new known because the Remote Gambling Bill, was introduced the other day and would largely ban remote gambling (including online gambling and betting by phone or other comparable means) for both local and foreign operators. The bill would authorize the government to need Internet service providers to block online that is unauthorized gambling, too as force banks and other financial institutions to block payments to and from such web sites.

Gambling Sites Would Join Existing Blacklist

Blocking websites is nothing new for Singapore, which already restricts access to around 100 web sites into the country. That blacklist mostly covers sites that feature hateful, extreme, or pornographic materials, and also famously includes dating site Ashley Madison at the moment.

The new bill would criminalize a range of activities related to online gambling. It would be unlawful for firms to offer games that are such Singaporeans, with organizations breaking that law being fined as much as SIN$500,000 ($400,000). Senior staff members at companies running these web sites could also face jail time. These laws apply both to foreign operators and those situated in Singapore.

Advertising to youth or minors that are allowing to sites is also included as an offense that carries a fine of SIN$300,000 ($240,000) and as much as six years in jail. Other fines could be levied for advertising remote gambling to Singapore residents. Individuals who gamble online could also be targeted with fines or up to six months of jail time.

Some Companies Could exemptions that are receive

However, the new law would not be a total ban in its current form. The bill does allow operators to apply for an exemption to the ban, which would enable them to continue (or start) providing remote gambling solutions in Singapore. Nevertheless, this exemption will likely only be available to local non-profit organizations that have already proven that they have actually a track record of complying with legal requirements.

Federal Government officials say that these tight regulations are designed to protect those many apt to be harmed by on line gambling.

‘The objectives for regulating gambling that is remote to maintain law and order and protect young persons along with other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by remote gambling,’ the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement.

Some specialists have questions as to simply how effective these measures will likely be in stopping Singaporeans from accessing gambling web sites. In the end, it may just come down to exactly how badly a given individual wants to play.

‘I believe blocking will at least keep out those gamblers that are casual people who just chance upon the sites,’ stated Alfred Siew, editor of Techgoondu, a technology website. ‘Whether it really is pornography or any other kind of objectionable content, if the individual is hardcore sufficient, he’ll discover a way to gain access to it.’

The bill comes after a six-week public consultation period by which many groups, including some in the gambling industry, had input into the legislation. Reportedly, the web gambling market in Singapore is said to be well worth about $416 million, with 95 percent of that total currently being spent at foreign internet sites.

Marty Walsh Slams MA Commissioners for Anti-Boston Bias

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh says the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is biased against their city with regards to casino web site selection. (Image: Arthur Pollock/

The Massachusetts casino battle has placed Boston Mayor Marty Walsh in a position that is unusual. He has simultaneously battled against allowing potential nearby casinos, while also trying getting the best deal that is possible his town if one ultimately is made. Through the procedure, Walsh has also had an abundance of criticism for the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, in which he fired away at them week that is again last.

Walsh accused the payment’s acting president of holding a bias from the populous city of Boston, and said that the board as a whole has been illegally manipulating the casino licensing process. The accusations come at a sensitive time, as the commission is currently debating whether to honor the sole Greater Boston area permit up to a Wynn development in Everett or perhaps a competing proposal for a Mohegan Sun casino at Suffolk Downs in Revere.

Walsh Accuses McHugh of Making statements that are biased

‘In the City’s view, the Commission has improperly manipulated the gaming licensing procedure by ignoring and violating the mandates of the Gaming Act…which requires the Commissioners to ‘conduct themselves in a manner in order to make decisions that are fair and unbiased and In the interest that is public” Walsh wrote in a letter to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. ‘The Commission has displayed bias that is clear the City of Boston in its decision-making and public statements.’

In the page, Walsh singled away comments by acting chairman James McHugh, who produced statement that Walsh ‘abandoned’ the Charlestown community by choosing not to participating in arbitration with Wynn over compensation for their casino project. He additionally said that McHugh played a role that is major stopping Boston from getting host community status for the two casino proposals, which may have offered the town veto power over the projects.

Walsh in addition has questioned statements made by McHugh in regards to the vote that is upcoming awarding the casino license. With board chairman Stephen Crosby having recused himself from the process, there are only four members left, meaning it is possible that the vote could end in a 2-2 tie between the Wynn and Mohegan projects. But McHugh has already said he is confident that won’t take place, which Walsh finds suspicious.

‘For a commissioner whom is not supposed to know what the near future of video gaming is within the Boston region, he’s making general public statements that he understands it will not be a tie,’ Walsh told the Boston world.

Commission Rejects Accusations

The commission has soundly refused Walsh’s charges, saying they’ve been very careful to make sure that Boston’s interests have been protected through the process.

‘The commission firmly rejects false accusations of bias and remains fully committed to protecting the integrity regarding the process,’ stated spokesperson Elaine Driscoll in a statement.

Last week, the payment released their reports on the two plans vying for the Boston-area casino license. Overall, the panel seemed to really have a slight preference for the Wynn’s plan, due in large part to the fact that the Everett resort seemed to be more ambitious. However, there were also sharp criticisms on what they deemed become a project design that is less-than-thrilling.

Meanwhile, the panel felt that the Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere was geared more towards attracting Boston-area consumers without encroaching on its Connecticut customer that is existing base. The Wynn also scored better in financing and financial benefits, while Mohegan won points due to their design and the direction they have handled the impact that is local casino may have.