Select Page

Former Mohegan Sun Pocono Exec Sentenced to 32 Months for Bogus Loyalty Card Scheme

A executive that is former the Mohegan Sun Pocono in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania has been sentenced to 32 months for his role in a scheme that involved the casino’s slot machines and creating bogus loyalty benefits.

Casino fraudster Robert Pellegrini (seen right here in December after pleading accountable) will be dealing in dapper matches for inmate orange during a 32-month prison sentence. He will also need to pay close to a half-million dollars in restitution to the casino where he once worked.

Robert Pellegrini was VP of player development for the Mohegan Sun when he and two others concocted a scheme to bilk his companies by using customers’ stolen loyalty card PIN numbers to play for free, permitting the gang to help keep the winnings. The operation ran from May 2014 to 2015, before Pellegrini was busted april.

It had been the role of Rochelle Poszeluznyj, a cocktail waitress, to notice down players’ loyalty card PIN numbers onto Pellegrini, who would create copies of the cards which he then loaded with free slot money as she served them drinks, before passing them. Then it had been Mark Joseph Heltzel, a client who had formerly been caught cheating at blackjack but was mysteriously not banned, who posed as a customer that is regular used the cards to play slots, splitting the winnings among the group.

The court was told how the trio utilized $478,100 in free slot play to come up with $418,793 in illicit winnings.

Problem Gambler

‘I’m a man that is flawed’ Pellegrini, who claims to be a issue gambler, told the judge. ‘I’ve made mistakes in my entire life, this being the greatest,’ he said. ‘I didn’t steal to cover my bills. It absolutely was to guide my gambling.’

Whenever asked just how a compulsive gambler could hold down a high-profile job at a casino, Pellegrini replied: ‘in which you think casino workers go on the days off? They visit other casinos.’

The scheme was uncovered when a dealer during the Mohegan Sun Pocono, who was apparently in deep love with Poszeluznyj, spilled the beans to authorities, because he viewed Heltzel as a rival for her affections.

Getting Busy

Prosecutor Michelle Olshefski countered Pellegrini’s assertion that he had perhaps not stolen for greed, noting that although the scam was ongoing, he had hundreds of 1000s of dollars within the bank, in addition to a range assets. She said phone records suggested he was the ringleader of the scheme and because he had ‘bills to spend. that he regularly told his accomplices to ‘get busy”

Nevertheless, Senior US District Judge A Richard Caputo departed from sentencing guidelines after hearing impassioned pleas from their family members and character testimonies suggesting he had been of otherwise character that is good.

Pellegrini must also pay $478,350 in restitution to his former manager. He could have received as much as 20 years in prison.

Poszeluzny and Heltzel have actually both pleaded guilty and are due to be sentenced at a later date. Heltzel faces 175 mostly felony counts of theft, identity theft, criminal conspiracy, and winning by fraud. His bail was initially set at $500,000, but was paid down to $150,000, with the knowing that he would surrender any firearms and pay just 10 percent of the bond to walk free until their sentencing date.

Federal Trade Commission Moves to Block DraftKings-FanDuel Merger

The US government took first steps toward quashing a proposed merger between day-to-day dream sports giants DraftKings and FanDuel, contending the transaction would create an illegal monopoly that controls 90 percent of this DFS market.

FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles (left) and DraftKings CEO Jason Robins (right) argued that a merger was at the best interests of DFS players, but FTC administrators disagreed. (Image: Vanity Fair)

On the Federal Trade Commission, in conjunction with the Offices of the Attorneys General of California and Washington DC, filed a suit in federal district court to seek an injunction to halt the deal friday.

‘ We are disappointed by this decision and continue to believe that the merger is within the best interest of our players, our businesses, our workers as well as the fantasy sports industry,’ stated DraftKings CEO Jason Robins and FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles in a joint statement. ‘ We are considering all our options at this right time.’

Antitrust-Worthy

The FTC claims the deal it illegal to engage in ‘unfair or misleading acts or practices in or affecting business. since it had been taking shape would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which forbids mergers and acquisitions that would in impact create a monopoly, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, helping to make’

Fundamentally, the FTC refused to swallow DrafKings’ and FanDuel’s core argument that daily fantasy sports comprised merely a small portion associated with much wider dream activities market, dominated by the variety that is season-long.

The commission concluded that DFS customers do not see season-long as a ‘meaningful substitute’ for DFS.

‘This merger would deprive customers of the substantial great things about direct competition between DraftKings and FanDuel,’ said Tad Lipsky, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.

The FTC contends that neither new entrants in the DFS company, nor any future expansion by existing operators, could be likely to deliver meaningful competition, as the two organizations hold a combined 90 percent market share that is estimated.

Love-Hate Relationship

DraftKings and FanDuel announced their intentions to merge last November, after months of speculation. As rivals, they spent an estimated $750 million trying to out-market one another, based on ESPN, while offering a broadly product that is similar.

Meanwhile, both companies have actually struggled after experiencing growth that is initially explosive. Regulatory uncertainty and legal challenges have actually plagued the industry from late 2015 onward, and it is on that front where in fact the two organizations believe together they might wage the strongest battle.

Tough Fold: Legal Online Poker Off the Table in New York for 2017

The State Assembly in nyc will not be passing a bill to legalize poker that is online the chamber adjourns this Wednesday, June 21. That’s according to the NY constant News, which talked to Assemblyman Gary Pretlow (D-Westchester), the prime sponsor of legislation that would’ve made the 4th many populous state the fourth state to own game that is online.

The internet poker dream team in New York, State Sen. John Bonacic (left) and Assemblyman Gary Pretlow say they will carry on their push for legal on-line poker in 2018. (Images: State of the latest York)

Assembly Bill 5250 sought to redefine Texas Hold’em and Omaha as games of skill rather than chance, a distinction that is key would’ve allowed both games to be played online.

But Pretlow changed their tune that is optimistic going the last week of legislative session, telling proponents to withhold their passion. ‘There was some opposition,’ Pretlow stated. ‘We’ll pick it up year that is next than likely.’

Year Better Luck Next

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA), the leading lobbying group for internet poker in Washington, DC, explained that the 2017 campaign in New York should give players plenty to cheer about.

‘This year the bill not only easily passed the Senate, but also for the time that is first an iPoker bill passed an Assembly committee. This is progress,’ the PPA said in a social media marketing post.

Pretlow happens to be at the forefront of trying to get rid of internet poker prohibition in the Empire State. The Democrat first introduced the topic into his chamber straight back in 2014, and throughout the last three years, he’s remain committed to advancing the discussion.

State Sen. John Bonacic County that is(R-Orange led the fight in the ny Senate, with a lot more success.

His companion bill earlier this month found a complete vote on the Senate floor and easily passed, 53-9. But once brought to the installation to be merged with Pretlow’s bill, it stalled in the Standing Committee on Codes.

A hurdle that is key how to handle ‘bad actors,’ such as PokerStars, an important supporter for the bill, whom accepted digital payments from New York customers even after the Unlawful online Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 prohibited it.

Another roadblock for 2018 is conventional knowledge that has discovered bills pertaining to gambling tending not to ever go during election years.

Population casino online real money Control

On the web poker in the United States has largely been a bust since 2011. That has been the Department of Justice issued an opinion that the Wire that is longstanding Act which banned most kinds of gambling through the transmission of phone lines, used just to sports betting.

That meant that individual states had been liberated to license and control online gaming activities except sports betting. Though the DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions has toyed with the basic idea of re-evaluating the 2011 opinion, so far efforts to restore the wire act with specific prohibitions on all types of on the web gambling also have fallen flat.

But still, only three states have actually legalized some forms of online gambling, plus the fairly tiny populations of Nevada, New Jersey, and Delaware have actuallyn’t quite allowed the poker to fully recognize its online potential.

Nyc, but, stood to considerably shake up the on-line poker landscape, with almost 20 million residents which could potentially more than double the size of this overall American player pool, while also encouraging other states to maneuver forward with legislation of the own.

Pennsylvania, the fifth many state that is populous immediately behind brand New York, is the next market to watch. The Keystone State is considering an extensive expansion of gambling and overhaul that is regulatory and there legalizing internet poker is a possibility still up for grabs.

Florida Seminole Tribe’s Bond Credit Rating Upgraded by Moody’s, Fitch

The Seminoles of Florida are going to conserve a lot of money in the coming months, after bond and credit history services Moody’s and Fitch both upgraded the tribe’s bank financial obligation and bond credit ratings.

The Seminole Tribe’s seven gambling enterprises in Florida, handled by video gaming professional Jim Allen, can borrow cash at lower rates of interest, after Moody’s and Fitch upgraded the indigenous United states group’s ratings. (Image: Miami Dolphins)

Moody’s Investment Services upgraded the Florida tribe’s existing term debt and bonds rating to Baa2, and its Special Obligation Bonds to Baa3. While those increases are welcomed news to the Seminoles, the classifications remain described as ‘non-investment grade’ speculations.

However, it inches the Tribe’s debt and bonds closer to investment-grade securities, and even the tiniest bump into the Moody’s rating ladder represents huge cost savings in terms of great interest compensated to lenders.

‘The ratings upgrades, affirmations and strong new ranks are superb news for the Seminole Tribe of Florida once we look toward a solid, stable future,’ Seminole Chairman Marcellus Osceola Jr. said in a presser. Seminole Gaming CEO Jim Allen added that the upgrades ‘will save yourself huge amount of money by assisting to keep costs that are borrowing.’

Bullish on Gaming

Whilst the Moody’s news was cheery, things are looking also brighter for the Seminoles at Fitch. The ratings agency upped its categorization for the Tribe’s video gaming division to BBB.

Where businesses rate according to the top credit assessors is key to how much they will be paying lenders. This chart shows how countries rate overall. (Image: World Economic Forum)

According to Fitch, the investment-grade difference is considering a favorable gambling environment in the Sunshine State, and the Seminoles’ ‘steady, good operating trends when compared with more flat growth seen in other US gaming markets.’

The Tribe has borrowed $2.4 billion to repay term that is outstanding and fund expansions at its Hollywood and Tampa casinos. ‘These enhanced and renewed investment-grade reviews … can help Seminole Gaming to continue as you of the planet’s many profitable gaming enterprises,’ Allen added.

Both ranks agencies additionally credited the tribe’s ongoing commitment to cover video gaming taxes to Tallahassee, despite not having a compact that is valid Florida.

Stalled in State’s Legislature

The state’s legislature didn’t come to terms over a new arrangement, with the House seeking to help keep gambling in its current status, although the Senate sought to expand gaming and put slots at dog and horse racetracks in eight counties.

The chamber that is upper wanted to allow the Seminoles to offer craps and roulette, in trade a commercial casino resort become built in either Broward or Miami-Dade Counties. Moody’s and Fitch thinks the tribe’s continuing to pay out gaming revenue could play into its favor during upcoming negotiations that are compact.

Bonds Explained

A bond is a debt investment issued by businesses to investors who provide the entities money. They have been different from stocks, in that the lender isn’t acquiring ownership within the debtor’s business.

The issuing of bonds occurs when a ongoing company requires to raise money. Bonds in many cases are viewed as fixed-income securities, while the companies issuing them agree to pay either an adjustable or fixed interest to lenders.

The interest rate is determined by how long the financing duration is, the number of annual payments to the lender, and most importantly, the credit quality of the bonds, namely, the risk from the loan.

Moody’s and Fitch reducing the risk that is long-term the Seminole Tribe’s bonds means interest rates will slightly diminish, as well as on $2.4 billion, that equates to millions of bucks conserved.

Touchdown for Redskins, as Supreme Court Overturns ‘Disparaging’ Trademark Patent workplace Ruling

The United States Supreme Court has sided with the Slants, an Asian-American rock band that was denied a trademark by the US Patent and Trademark Office on the grounds that the name was disparaging to persons of Asian descent in a major ruling that reverses a longstanding statute.

The Washington Redskins trademark wasn’t renewed in 2015 by the US Patent and Trademark Office, but the Supreme Court says the statutory law is on the NFL group’s side. (Image: Ann Heisenfelt/Associated Press)

Composing in almost all viewpoint, Justice Samuel Alito declared, ‘ The commercial market is well-stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and teams, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear. If affixing the label that is commercial the suppression of any speech which could lead to governmental or social ‘volatility,’ free speech will be jeopardized.’

Three years ago, online activities books had the odds of Washington being forced to change the team’s name at around Yes (+300), No (-500). As is usually the situation, the bookmakers got it right.

The ruling is a touchdown for Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder. Snyder has repeatedly refused to rename the NFL franchise, despite intense public scrutiny and even after multiple indigenous American teams said they discovered the group name to be disparaging.

In 2014, 50 US Senators, 48 Democrats, and two Independents, finalized a letter delivered to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell asking the league to force the Redskins to rebrand. The document requested the league’s ownership send the message ‘that racism and bigotry do not have accepted place in expert sports.’

What is in a Name?

Should the Supreme Court have seen the instance an additional light, the fallout could have been far-reaching. In US sports, there is a host of potentially controversial group names.

In Major League Baseball, there is the Indians and Braves, and some have a nagging problem with the Yankees designation. In the NBA, there’s the Boston Celtics, characterized by an obese, pipe smoking Leprechaun. There is the NFL Kansas City Chiefs and Minnesota Vikings, and in university activities, the Spartans, Trojans, Scots, and Irish are among potentially ‘negative’ names in NCAA programs that are athletic.

Of course, one man’s ‘offensive’ is another’s ‘who really cares?’ Cases in point:

The NFL’s Las Vegas Raiders are coming to town, albeit not until 2020. The Oakland franchise was at first likely to be called the Señors, but was changed to the Raiders in 1960. Can some guy in a football helmut with an optical eye area and swords on either side of his head be looked at offensive? The Las Vegas Golden Knights are coming to play in the NHL this fall. Are knights an indicator of white privilege? Classist elitism? Imperialist conquering? The Crusades?

It’s all in exactly how you see it, while the tall Court says additionally it is all within the bounds of free speech.

Talk Freely

The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) had denied the Slants’ application by citing the Lanham Act. The 1946 federal statute requires trademark requests to do not be disparaging in nature, and to avoid falsely suggesting a ‘connection with people, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or nationwide symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute.’

The PTO attempted to make the argument that trademarks are federal government speech, as they’re qualifying by the agency that is federal. Justice Alito rejected that reasoning, saying, ‘It offends a bedrock First Amendment concept: Speech might not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.’