Select Page

666Bet <span id="more-7603"></span>Owner Paul Bell, Metro Play, Forced Into Liquidation

Harry Redknapp, who appeared in television spots for 666Bet before the arrest of director Paul Bell brought the ongoing business crashing down.

Metro Play Ltd, operator of troubled betting websites and, has been issued with a liquidation that is compulsory by the online gaming licensing jurisdiction of Alderney.

Former Metro Play customers who continue to be owed money by the company have been instructed to contact the liquidator,KPMG Channel Islands, in order to see redress.

Metro Play marketed big when it arrived on the scene, hoping to become a big player in the lucrative UK sports betting market.

With a television advertising campaign that starred soccer coach Harry Redknapp, a top sponsorship with soccer group Leyton Orient, and gambling partnerships with several other people, the business quickly started to make the desired effect.

But suddenly, in March 19, Metro Play had its gambling license revoked by the UK Gambling Commission for reasons that were unspecified during the time.

The regulator merely said that the organization was ‘unsuitable to carry on the licensed activities.’

Paul Bell Arrest

Soon after, Paul Bell, a Metro Play manager, was arrested in London as the biggest market of a £21 million ($31 million) income tax money and fraud laundering investigation.

The stockbroker that is former released by authorities before being re-arrested the next day when he arrived in the Isle of Man by private jet.

Metro Enjoy has constantly insisted that Bell’s allegedly criminal activities had been entirely unrelated to the operations for the two gambling websites.

Nevertheless, nervy clients who attempted to withdraw funds in the aftermath were not able to do this.

The Alderney regulator, this indicates, had informed Metro Play’s manufacturers, including payment service providers, that its permit was revoked and they broke ranks, cancelling the embattled company to their contracts.

While customers angrily demanded their money, Metro Play stated it absolutely was unable to function or to process the simplest transaction.

Payments Dry Up

‘While the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) have stated as it does not recognise the fact that, as a web-based company, we need to be online in order for customers to action their withdrawals via their accounts,’ pleaded Metro Play that we do not require a licence in order for customers to withdraw their money and authorised us to do so, this is misleading.

The company sooner or later struck a handle Skrill and began processing payments in May, although these showed up to dry up at the start of June.

The united kingdom Gambling Commission posted notice of the liquidation purchase on its website this and stated that Metro Play’s license ‘has lapsed’ and that the company was ‘no longer licensed to provide facilities for gambling’ in the UK week.

The regulator included so it ‘does not know whether this development shall have impact on the payment of outstanding balances to customers.’

Vote On North Jersey Casino Unlikely In 2015

Assemblyman Ralph Caputo is perhaps the leading advocate for expanded casino gambling in nj. (Image:

New Jersey officials and residents continue to be debating whether the state should approve brand new casinos in North or Central Jersey, the very first that could exist in the state outside of Atlantic City.

But while the possibility to build new venues to compete with regional competition from Pennsylvania and New York is intriguing, voters will most likely not get to weigh in on the issue in 2010.

So that you can get a question on a ballot that is statewide would ask voters to amend their state’s constitution to enable for new gambling enterprises outside of Atlantic City, state legislators would have to accept a bill by August 3rd.

While the nj-new Jersey Senate is scheduled to meet up with on July 23, it is unclear if the proposal would also be on the agenda, and the state installation doesn’t have conference scheduled with this summer time.

2016 Vote More Realistic

‘Maybe within the next few days the stars could align and we could see something happen, but right now I wouldn’t normally bet the house,’ stated Assemblyman Scott Rumama (R-Wayne). ‘There’s still talk of wanting to place it in the ballot in 2016.’

But most lawmakers, including those who have strongly supported building one or more casinos that are new hawaii, have actually admitted that the vote probably will not be coming this year.

‘I think there was a strategy we’re able to have used to get this accomplished,’ said Assemblyman Ralph Caputo (D-Essex), one of the chief advocates for gambling expansion into the state. ‘But there are plenty of…influences that are pushing it in a different direction.’

The proposal is a controversial one amongst both lawmakers and nj-new Jersey residents.

Poll Shows Tepid Support for New Casino

It’s hardly surprising that representatives of Atlantic City are contrary to the concept.

They argue that the casino that is new in brand New Jersey would mostly provide to cannibalize revenues which are currently enjoyed by the eight resorts within the city, and prospects of revenue sharing from North Jersey casinos hasn’t been enough to get them on board.

However, there was skepticism that is also widespread New Jersey residents, even outside the Atlantic City area.

Based on a poll conducted final thirty days by Fairleigh Dickinson free spins planet 7 oz University, only 37 percent of New Jersey residents were in favor of allowing casinos outside of Atlantic City, while 56 percent opposed the plan.

‘The public is questioning the logic behind enabling the spread of casino gambling,’ stated political technology professor Krista Jenkins. ‘ They don’t seem to be sold on the idea of saving the gaming industry in the state by allowing it to distribute.’

The poll additionally found that fears of cannibalization may have some truth in their mind. If brand new casinos were built, 34 percent of New Jersey residents said they’d be more likely to go to them, while only 31 percent said they would probably still visit Atlantic City venues.

The proposed amendment would have to be publically available for at least 20 days, after which a public hearing would have to be held on the issue in order to get the question on the ballot.

New Jersey legislators in both houses would then need to pass the constitutional amendment with a three-fifths bulk.

Given that the vote would need to happen by August 3, this means that the proposed amendment would have to be introduced within the next days that are few something which appears most unlikely to take place.

GBGA Challenge to UK Point of Consumption Tax Referred to EU Court of Justice

The Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) has made a significant gain in its ongoing legal battle against the UK’s point of consumption (POC) tax, that was introduced by the new UK Gambling Act at the end of last year.

After the British High Court accepted the GBGA concerns throughout the legality regarding the point of consumption income tax, it’s now been referred for consideration into the EU Court of Justice, Europe’s highest court. (Image:

The High Court of England and Wales ruled on Tuesday that issues surrounding the legality of the tax should really be considered by the European Court of Justice, the highest court into the European Union.

The GBGA has persistently argued that the point of consumption tax is illegal under European law, because it violates Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which deals with the right to trade easily across edges.

Regime Change

The UK Gambling Act introduced a 15 percent duty for several gambling operators wishing to engage with the market that is british all of whom also have to be licensed and controlled in the UK. Previously, organizations were able to be licensed in an amount of jurisdictions round the globe that were whitelisted by the UK, such as Gibraltar, which offered a more level that is favorable of for operators.

GBGA initially challenged the act itself within the tall Court, a challenge that had been eventually rejected in October 2014, although it did have the consequence of delaying the implementation of the new licensing regime by 30 days.

Undeterred, the organization relaunched its demand for a judicial review, this time around focusing solely on the legality of the idea of consumption tax, rather than the act, which, as a taxation issue instead than the usual certification issue, went through a split process that is legislative.

Constitutional Value

Into the case that is latest, the judge, Justice Charles, has asked the ECJ to rule on whether limitation in the provision of services from Gibraltar, and the taxes payable under the new regime, constitute a breach of Article 56, a matter he said that was of ‘constitutional value.’

The judge also asked the ECJ to determine whether the reasons used by the UK government to justify the new licensing regime were valid. The GBGA disputes the government’s assertion that its aim that is sole is protect customers, arguing that instead it will drive British citizens towards ‘rogue operators.’

‘If responsible foreign operators are forced to raise prices [i.e., offer less favorable odds or a higher rake], it is inevitable that lots of consumers will move to companies with no regulation and lower overheads,’ the GBGA said recently. ‘Rogue operators will be beyond reach of UK law and customers will face increased risks of fraudulence, non-payment and abuse.’

The GBGA further argues that since there clearly was no rise that is recorded problem gambling since the implementation of the previous regime, reforms were unnecessary, as customers had been already adequately protected. Therefore, the only motivation is to increase revenue, the organization asserts.